So here's an interesting fact. Let's assume I was unfortunate enough to suffer from carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. This could happen because of a faulty furnance or a house fire (among other things). If I was a smoker and my CO level at the hospital was <10%, no one would likely get too excited. If I was a non-smoker and my CO level at the hospital was <3%, no one would likely get too excited. Notice a difference?
The point is smokers can walk around with a CO level that is equivalent to CO poisoning. Even if a smoker is involved in a CO poisoning incident, it may be hard to tell because they may live with a chronic CO level of up to 10%. Anything over 3% in a non-smoker would be cause for treatment with 100% oxygen and maybe even hyperbaric oxygen treatment. If you're a smoker...not so much, you may live at that level already.
Why should the hospital get excited about your acute CO poisoning when you've been doing it to yourself chronically already?
Friday, August 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)